While NASCAR’s “rubbin’ is racin'” mentality is well known in the motorsport world, the American stock car racing series appears to have one rule that Formula One does not: intentional contact results in a penalty.
During Free Practice 3 for the 2024 Spanish Grand Prix, two separate incidents occurred in which drivers appeared to make contact with the competition out of frustration, and both drivers — Charles Leclerc and Lance Stroll — avoided penalties for what many saw as a serious infraction. What could Formula 1 learn from NASCAR when it comes to intentional contact?
What happened during FP3 at the Spanish Grand Prix?
During the penultimate practice session coming up to the Spanish Grand Prix, two occurrences of unnecessary contact occurred but were not penalized.
Lance Stroll and Lewis Hamilton collided in Turn 5. Stroll speculated a few corners ago that Hamilton “thinks he’s alone on the track” after getting in Stroll’s way — but as Hamilton drove wide to let Stroll pass, the Aston Martin driver followed Hamilton’s arc and clipped him.
Stroll, on the other hand, claimed that he drove into Hamilton to “express his displeasure” with his competitor, implying that he intentionally crashed into Hamilton.
The stewards reviewing the footage, however, determined that the the contact was “incidental” and “erratic,” albeit not dangerous. Stroll was reprimanded but faced no penalty.
Just minutes after the Stroll-Hamilton incident, Charles Leclerc swiped his Ferrari across the nose of Lando Norris after seemingly being frustrated by the McLaren driver getting in his way. Leclerc moved to his left and made contact with Norris, appearing to be furious in the cockpit.
Though Leclerc took a more gracious approach after the fact and called the coming together a “misunderstanding” occasioned by the two drivers being forced to abort their fast laps, the on-track maneuver was still questionable. He, too, avoided any penalty for the mishap.
While Leclerc’s explanation offers some wiggle room regarding fault and intent, Stroll certainly seemed unapologetic. It should go without saying that it’s incredibly dangerous to make contact with a competitor intentionally, and that kind of behavior should be penalized.
Fascinatingly, in this regard, NASCAR has better protocol than Formula 1.
What’s different in NASCAR?
I won’t go so far as to say that NASCAR is the perfect shining example of how a race series should operate when it comes to contact; the stock car series is designed with bumping in mind, and it does often tend to be quite lax about potential penalty issues if there’s at least some doubt that the contact was the result of a racing incident.
However, NASCAR makes no qualms about the fact that it will penalize its drivers who state that their crashes were done with intent.
In early 2023, for example, NASCAR fined driver Denny Hamlin and docked him 25 points after intentionally crashing into Ross Chastain during the end of the spring Phoenix race. Hamlin later spoke out on his podcast, saying that he intended to crash into Chastain.
Stewards cited Sections 4.4 of the NASCAR Rule Book, titled the NASCAR Code of Conduct, that forbids drivers from attempting to manipulate a race by wrecking the competition, or by engaging in “actions NASCAR finds to be detrimental” to the sport.
Yes, that crash took place during a race — but the moment Hamlin verbally admitted to intentionally hitting a competitor, he was penalized.
Formula 1 is unquestionably a different beast when compared to NASCAR in many ways, but those differences don’t mean that knowledge can’t be shared between the two sports. In fact, I would argue that F1 should treat any kind of frustrated, intentional contact with a far heavier hand than it has this weekend thanks to the expense of the cars and the dangers of the open-wheel format. Even if the contact didn’t put anyone in danger, the act was still dangerous.
F1 would do well to revisit its rules regarding contact and intent, and to adopt a mindset similar to that of NASCAR: that any intentional contact is worth a penalty. There’s no reason to wait until one frustrated action results in someone getting hurt.
Be the first to comment